لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................

ninety three . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to your main case, It is usually a perfectly-recognized proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is subject to your procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings over the evidence.

A survey of PACER consumers, conducted in 2021, measured user satisfaction and identified areas for improvement with PACER services. The Administrative Office of your U.S. Courts is using the survey results to evaluate and prioritize future changes to PACER services and functions.

maintaining the conviction awarded to your appellant reduce the sentence of the appellant from imprisonment for life to one already undergone(Pakistan Penal Code)

Because of their position between the two main systems of law, these types of legal systems are sometimes referred to as blended systems of regulation.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to your main case, It's also a properly-set up proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is matter into the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to reach at its independent findings about the evidence.

Where there are several members of a court deciding a case, there could possibly be one or more judgments offered (or reported). Only the reason for your decision on the majority can represent a binding precedent, but all may very well be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning might be adopted in an argument.

The Court viewed as the case for being maintainable under Article 184 (3) For the reason that Hazard and encroachment alleged were like to violate the constitutional right to life when interpreted expansively.

The Court directed the Chief Secretary of Sindh to ensure the Act's effective implementation in line with its first purpose and called for educational programs Bachelor diploma(s) in the topic of cooperative societies. Read more

When the petitioner is solely present in the place of occurrence without causing any injury to the deceased or PWs then in such circumstances, whether He's vicariously liable shall be decided because of the uncovered trial Court after recording uk case law search engine in the evidence.

Finally, a vital contribution of this case which was accepted for consideration from the Court under Article 184 (3), has become setting a precedent which allows for much a lot easier access into the public to method the superior courts as well as the subordinate courts on environment related issues.

In order to prove murder, there should be an intention to cause the death of that person along with the action of actually injuring them – and that injury subsequently leading to and causing the death of that person.

13309-B of 2010 to get weak types of evidence as well as evidentiary value whereof would be found with the time with the trial. The investigation of this case has already been finalized and, Hence, confirmed custody on the petitioner in jail is not going to serve any advantageous purpose at this stage.”

This section specifically relates to civil servants who will be rendered surplus a result of the reorganization or abolition of the division, department, or office. Non-civil servants, by definition, are not matter to the provisions in the Civil Servants Act. Their terms and conditions of service are typically governed by separate contracts or agreements with the employing organization. Therefore, the provisions of Section eleven-A, such as the possibility of being posted to another department, would not implement to non-civil servants. Read more